View from Silicon Valley
IBM /Lenovo Part 1: The underlying market(s)
Home
Santa Clara Co. median (updated Sep 6th)
San Mateo Co. median
Santa Cruz Co. median
Santa Clara Co. stats (updated Aug23)
SEMI B:B to Jul'08 (updated Aug30)
SIA Data '04 -Jun'08 (updated Aug15)
Wafer area vs.SIA$ 2Q08(updated Aug30)
VC Funding -4Q07 (updated Apr27)
SV Stats (Updated!)
Links
About Us
Sample report:
December 21, 2004

View from Silicon Valley- IBM /Lenovo Part 1: The underlying market(s)

(c) copyright View from Silicon Valley, 2004.  All rights reserved.


Raise your hand if you remember Osborne Computers.  How about Commodore?  Anyone ever own a Zenith PC?  How many of you remember Honeywell was in the PC business in the early-80's?  Packard Bell?  Eagle?  DEC?  Sinclair?  Many well-known and sought-after early-80's PC suppliers, not to mention those not so well-known, dropped out.  Several no longer even exists.

During the latter part of my five years with AMD, one of the few things I believed from Jerry Sanders was (roughly), "It's all about winning and losing.  If you're not gaining market share, you are losing."  Sanders was referring to CPU shipments but this clearly also applies to today's PC market.

When the Lenovo /IBM deal was announced, a wide range of adjectives and verbs were used to describe the deal.  Lenovo had one take, IBM produced another.  Chinese newspapers described the deal one way, the US papers another.

Stepping back from the "spin" it is useful to stop and study the underlying PC market.  Then maybe we can see if these various pronouncements ring true once the underlying reality is understood.  (We will study the pronouncements in "IBM/ Lenovo Part 2.")

You've heard it before but it bears repeating: over 100 railroad companies eventually condensed down to a handful today.  Roughly 60 US automobile companies are now down to only three.  Over the last 20 years, the  US PC market has shrunk from 50+ manufacturers, all begging Intel for enough allocation to reach 10% market share, down to maybe a dozen.

Today, the top five or six PC suppliers account for 65%+ of US demand.  Based on the history of railroads and automobiles, the firms below the top tier would not seem to have bright prospects for sales or profit growth, probably not even for survival...

According to Gartner, the recent US PC market is:
------------------------------------
2Q04                2Q204    Market
Rank    Vendor    Shipments   Share
-------------------------------------
1      Dell         4,396     32.9%
2      HPQ          2,574     19.3%
3 Gateway/eMachines   752      5.6%
4      IBM            750      5.6%
5      Apple          495      3.7%  (Top 5 = 67.1%)
       Others       4,391     32.9%

       Total       13,357    100.0%
--------------------------------------

While the global market has a couple different players, and is not as concentrated in the top five, Gartner shows a lot of similarity:
-----------------------------------------
                    2Q04     Market
Company           Shipments   Share
------------------------------------------
1  Dell             7,080     16.5% 
2  HPQ              6,130     14.3%
3  IBM              2,535      5.9%  
4  Fujitsu/Siemens  1,506      3.5% 
5  Acer             1,302      3.0%  (Top 5 = 43.2%)
   Others           24,249    56.7% 

   Total            42,802   100.0% 
------------------------------------------
Note: All data includes desktop and mobile PCs plus X86-32 servers.

Add NEC and Toshiba at just over 2% share each, Lenovo at 2% and Gateway/ eMachines at just under 2%, to bump up the total up a little. After those, it falls off pretty fast.

As an aside, Apple Computer's global market share fell from 2.1% in 2Q04 to 1.8% 3Q04 (3.7% down to 3.2%/3Q04 in the U.S).  Despite small, and declining, MAC market share, a lot of people seem to think the iPOD will somehow insulate Apple from continued PC share and margin decline.  This seems unlikely.  Particularly when an avalanche of new, lower-cost MP3 players starts to arrive from China in 2005.

Back to the original point, the above market share data makes it hard to explain why an apparently small and little-known player like Lenovo was able to cut a deal with IBM.  Lenovo bought not only IBM's PC business, but also the "ThinkPad" brand?!?

It is somewhat less-difficult to explain when you study the China PC market (also per Gartner):
------------------------------------------
2003             2003            3Q04
Rank Company    Shipments Share  Rank
------------------------------------------
1    Lenovo     3.545M     27%   26.4%
2    Founder    1.314M     10%   10.3%
3    TongFang   995,000     8%    8.7%
4    Dell       860,000     7%    8.1%
5    IBM        642,000     5%    6.0%
6    HPQ        442,000     3%    5.2% (64.7%)
7    TCL        410,000     3%
8    Acer       215,000     2%
9    Hedy       200,000     2%
10   Great Wall 172,000     1% (68%)
------------------------------------------
(Note: Annual China figures are annual vs. US/global numbers use quarterly.)

A few comments:

Just like the US PC market 20 years ago, the ranks of China PC suppliers are compressing.  In 2003, you needed eight suppliers to reach 65% TAM.  By 3Q04 it was down to six.  Now 2005 will be down to five with January, 2005 yet to actually arrive.

According to reports, Dell gained share in China this year despite abandoning the lowest-priced portion of the market (where volume is high but PCs ship with no operating system).  Dell's mail order model has struggled in an environment where seeing and touching something before buying is considered the only sure way to prevent being cheated. 

HPQ (Hewlett-Packard/Compaq) gained share, but reportedly on the back of aggressive price cuts.  Assuming this is accurate, the results figure to hit HPQ's bottom line in the very near future.

When you see Lenovo is actually 5.5x the size of IBM inside China, maybe the deal is a little less surprising.  When you learn IBM is first in notebooks while Lenovo is first in Desktops, synergy is more apparent.

In Part 2, we will look at who "won" in this deal -- and who didn't...