|
|
 |
|
|
 |
>
October 23, 2006
The Last 30 days (Oct'06 Edition)
(c) copyright View from Silicon Valley, 2006. All rights reserved.
Are we in the
last days of the Silicon Valley real estate boom? It's impossible to say with certainty but one way to gain insight
is looking at the numbers.
Back in March
(2006) we documented median house prices in Silicon Valley
make most of their annual increases from February to April. We found the
six months starting July showed median price changes of: +0.0% (2003);
+1.6% (2004) and -0.9% (2005) over the last three years.
So how are prices
doing lately?
Re-creating our "The Next 60 days'" table, using the local paper's figures for "Total
Resale Homes":
Median +/-$ 2003
2004 2005 2006 January
-$4K -$47K -0-
+$1K
February +$7K
+$52K +$22K +$17K March -$10K +$39K +$33K +$12K April
+$15K +$11K +$17K -$10K May -$4K
+$15K +$8K +$27K June
+$29K +$9K +$15K +$15K
July -$24K -$9K
-$5K -$20K August
+$17K -0- +$14K
-$27K
September
-$3K +$5K -$9K +$10K <= +$25K YTD October
+$10K +$5K +$9K November -0-
-0- +$1K December -0-
+$10K -$15K Total +$43K +$90K +$90K
Comparing YTD numbers for the last four years, we find
YTD thru 2003 2004 2005 2006
Sept. +$23K +$75K +$95K
+$25K
Let's peek at YTD volume over the last few years.
Resales
Sold 2003 2004 2005 2006
September 1,945 1,865 1,759 1,192
YTD 14,895 17,594 15,873 11,852
Y-o-y volume is negative for
the 22nd straight month (since December, 2004) and 25th out of the last 26. (Putting the volume peak at August,
2004.)
The
monthly realtors' blurbs only focus on volume
and price vs. last year (y-o-y).
To make thinks a little more interesting, let's invent
a "new" statistic "year-over-two-years-ago" or "y-o-2y":
Resale
Units 2003 2004 2005 2006 y-o-y y-o-2y
September 1,945 1,865 1,759 1,192 -32.2% -36.1%
YTD 14,895 17,594 15,873 11,852 -25.3% -32.6%
Part of the rationale for ignoring
y-o-y (and even y-o-2y) volume is the claim there aren't enough properties for sale. The latest figures for single-family
homes are:
January 12 1,687
February 9 1,818
March 9
2,103
April
9 2,194
May 7 2,606
June 8 2,974
July 6 3,185
August 10 3,389
September 7 3,401
October 5 3,389 (+100.9%)
We believe this understates the actual available volume since the
MLS for Santa Clara County currently lists 3,985 single-family homes in Santa Clara County (as of October 21, 2006).
Breaking down
the details:
Peak Since
All Homes *Current Peak Date Peak
y-o-y
Santa Clara Co. $675K $690K Jul26'06 -2.2% +2.3%
San Mateo Co. $767K $775K Jul20'05 -1.0% -2.0%
Santa Cruz Co. $702K $720K May26'05 -2.5% +3.2%
Resale Homes
Santa Clara Co. $735K $772K Jul20'06 -4.8% +4.3%
San Mateo Co.
$802K $830K Aug11'05 -3.4% -1.8%
Santa Cruz Co. $748K $775K Nov04'05 -3.5% +1.1%
*= through September
26
San
Mateo and Santa Cruz numbers are much more volatile than Santa Clara County. They bounce, up and down, on
lower volume, more than Santa Clara County on a regular basis.
* * * * *
"All Homes"
y-o-y price:
SantaClara SanMateo
SantaCruz
County County
County
Dec'05 14.8%
12.5% 17.4%
Jan 15.5% 8.2%
13.5%
Feb 14.2% 6.4% 12.6%
Mar 10.2% 3.4%
8.0%
Apr 6.3%
-0.1% 11.5%
May 7.0% 3.4%
8.3%
June
4.7% 2.6% 0.0%
July 3.9% -0.1% -3.6%
August 1.7% -2.0% -3.5%
Sept. *
2.3% -2.0% 3.2%
"Resale
Homes" y-o-y price:
SantaClara SanMateo SantaCruz
County County
County
Dec'05 16.5%
10.7% 10.9%
Jan 13.6% 10.8%
4.7%
Feb 13.0% 5.7% -0.3%
Mar 10.6% 3.8%
3.8%
Apr 5.1%
2.5% 10.8%
May 9.4% 2.0%
5.7%
June 9.2%
1.9% 5.7%
July 7.1% 1.9% 1.2%
August
2.8% 1.9% -2.3%
Sept. 4.3% -1.8% 1.1%
Bottom Line:
We have first-hand
experience with it. A large part of why this web site exists because of the truth behind the old adage about how
one can deceive people with, "Lies, damn lies and statistics."
Until further
notice, the above will be offered without commentary, editorial, ranting, raving nor even snarky sarcasm. (Of course,
we also reserve the right to change our mind.)
We hope you enjoy the data!
* * * * *
The above is not intended as advice to buy,
sell or hold any stock, bond, real estate nor any other financial product or service. Invest at your own risk.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |