View from Silicon Valley
Employment bandwagon (Oct'06)
Home
Santa Clara Co. median (updated Sep 6th)
San Mateo Co. median
Santa Cruz Co. median
Santa Clara Co. stats (updated Aug23)
SEMI B:B to Jul'08 (updated Aug30)
SIA Data '04 -Jun'08 (updated Aug15)
Wafer area vs.SIA$ 2Q08(updated Aug30)
VC Funding -4Q07 (updated Apr27)
SV Stats (Updated!)
Links
About Us
 
October 25, 2006
 
Employment bandwagon (Oct'06)
 
(c) copyright, View from Silicon Valley, 2006.  All rights reserved.
 
 
 
There was another round of headlines over the last week claiming job growth in Silicon Valley was strong.  The proclamation was this "proves" we are "recovered" from the dot-com bust.  (The implication was this allegedly-strong job growth would lead to continued strong housing prices.)
 
We last wrote about this nonsense June 1, 2006: http://www.viewfromsiliconvalley.com/id228.html comparing April, 1996, 2001 and 2006 jobs numbers.
 
At the time, 78% of Santa Clara County's 2,700 new (non-farm) jobs were in construction, hotels, restaurants, health care or government.  Let's call this category "CHRG" or "Charge
 
Today, let's compare September, 1996, 2001, 2006 and 2006 job numbers.  These are the figures from California's own database:
 
                         Sep'96   Sep'01   Sep'05   Sep'06
Total Jobs                888.0    996.1    877.9    886.4
Nonfarm Jobs              881.6    987.1    870.0    878.4
Construction               35.5     49.3     46.5     46.8
Manufacturing             249.1    237.9    171.2    171.4
Semiconductor Mfg.         71.1     68.9     50.9     51.6
Trade, Transport & Utils  139.2    145.6    132.5    134.2
Information                26.3     39.6     34.8     35.8
Financial Activities       31.9     36.1     36.2     36.8
Prof & Bus Services       159.7    192.4    160.5    162.1
Real Estate                23.7     26.6     26.1     27.0
Education & Health Svcs    76.3     89.4     95.0     95.7
Leisure & Hospitality      65.1     73.2     73.9     75.9
Government                 87.7     96.7     93.8     94.1
 
Just for fun:
Federal Government         13.5     11.8     11.3     11.0
State/Local Gov't          74.2     77.4     75.1     75.6
Ratio                       5.5x     6.6x     6.6x     6.9x
 
Adding private sector jobs (tracked by the state but not reported locally):
Total Private             809.5    890.4    776.2    784.3
                           89.5%    89.4%    88.4%    88.5%
"Charge" Jobs             264.6    308.6    309.2    312.5
                           29.8%    31.0%    35.2%    35.3%
 
 
Unfortunately, this format masks Sep'06 y-o-y total job growth was +8.5Ku (+0.97%) but y-o-y CHARGE growth at +3.3K accounted for 39%(!!) these new jobs.
 
Just like mainstream media, we reserve the right to invent new statistics when it suits our purposes.  Today's newly-invented statistic will be "decade-over-decade" (or d-o-d) growth.
 
Running the same table for d-o-d we get:
 
                         Sep'06    d-o-d   d-o-d%
Total Jobs                886.4    -1.6K    -0.2% (=-0.0018)
Nonfarm Jobs              878.4    -3.2K    -0.4%
Construction               46.8   +11.3K   +31.8%
Manufacturing             171.4   -77.7K   -31.2%
Semiconductor Mfg.         51.6   -19.5K   -27.4%
Trade, Transport & Utils  134.2    -5.0K    -3.6%
Information                35.8    +9.5K   +36.1%
Financial Activities       36.8    +4.9K   +15.4%
Prof & Bus Services       162.1    +2.4K    +1.5%
Real Estate                27.0    +3.3K   +13.9%
Education & Health Svcs    95.7   +19.4K   +25.4%
Leisure & Hospitality      75.9   +10.8K   +16.6%
Government                 94.1    +6.4K    +7.3%

Once more people understand we are +51.2K CHARGE jobs d-o-d, fewer of us will pay any attention to the monthly headlines claiming Silicon Valley is "back."  Yes, there are a few more jobs out there.  No, there is not a widespread resumption of the mid-to-late-90's prosperity, let alone the bubble years.
 
Extracting out the jobs not involved in enterprises required to earn a profit, building houses or paying minimum wage, the actual growth over the last 10 years is negative.
 
 
Conclusion:
Check the actual numbers before jumping on any bandwagons.
 
 * * * * *
The above is not intended as advice to buy, sell or hold any stock, bond, real estate nor any other financial product or service.  Invest at your own risk.