View from Silicon Valley
The real "news" in VC funding
Home
Santa Clara Co. median (updated Aug16)
San Mateo Co. median
Santa Cruz Co. median
Santa Clara Co. stats (updated Jul15)
SEMI B:B to Apr'08 (updated Jul28)
SIA Data '04 -Jun'08 (updated Aug15)
Wafer area vs.SIA$ 4Q07(updated Jun21)
VC Funding -4Q07 (updated Apr27)
SV Stats (Updated!)
Links
About Us
November 15, 2006

The "real" news in VC spending...

(c) copyright View from Silicon Valley, 2006.  All rights reserved.



Nationwide 1H06 VC spending was $12.97M.  This figure was breathlessly reported as up +13% y-o-y and ascribed various other dramatically-wonderful attributes compared prior levels.  As usual, the spin here in Silicon Valley never stops.

As we often recommend, let's look at the actual facts:

1H98   $8.38M
1H99   16.57
1H00   52.15
1H01   20.63
1H02   12.30
1H03    8.97
1H04   11.64
1H05   11.48
1H06   12.97


You can even spin 1H06 as +45% from 2003, which feels like a solid, even strong, three-year growth rate.  Alternatively, 1H06 is only up +5.4% since 2002, which is a truly awful four-year growth rate.

Even first-time readers can imagine the next set of data we're going to show... 

Silicon Valley VC spending since 1998 as a share of the US total:

       *USA    *S.V.  share
1998  $17.9M   $5.6M   31%
1999   49.5    18.4    37%
2000   94.8    33.7    36%
2001   36.4    11.8    32%
2002   22.1     7.6    34%
2003   19.5     6.9    35%
2004   22.2     8.2    37%
2005   22.4     8.3    37%
2006   25.9     8.6    33%  (annualized)


*= (all figures $M)

It's true Silicon Valley is still the king of the VC spending hill and 1H06 was the highest in five years.  However, the Silicon Valley-based 2006 run-rate is still less than 26% of the $33.7M spent by VCs in Silicon Valley in 2000.

Searching for another way to spin the numbers, let's look at Silicon Valley VC spending vs. jobs.  Aren't the additional jobs needed to run all these hot start-ups the real reason for tracking these figures in the first place?
 
Let's see:
        VC$     Jobs*
1998    5.6     912.1
1999   18.4     924.5
2000   33.7     941.5
2001   11.8     867.9
2002    7.6     803.5
2003    6.9     770.5
2004    8.2     771.9
2005    8.3     781.6
2006    8.6**   784.6


*= Santa Clara County employment, September each year
**= annualized

Can anybody find a correlation here?  If so, please send us a memo as we seem to have missed it.

In the end, ~$25M in VC spending is still, "better than a sharp stick in the eye," as my grandmother used to say.

However:
1) the 2006 run-rate is 25.5% of the 2000 peak,
2) 1H06 represent only a 1.4% CAGR since 1H02

3) Silicon valley VC spending has no effect on Santa Clara County jobs
4) jobs are still down since 2002 (-2.4%)
-and-
5) not to mention jobs are down since 1998 (-14%!).

Conclusion:
Enjoy the headlines but recognize VC spending is still merely a shadow of its former self.

VC spending is having NO effect on jobs (unless the VC's happens to be investing in your start-up).
 
* * * * *
The above is not intended as advice to buy, sell or hold any stock, bond, real estate nor any other financial product or service.  Invest at your own risk.