(c) copyright View from Silicon Valley, 2008.
All rights reserved.
Except for the concession, "sales drag along bottom," DataQuick's
press release this month seemed completely routine. Nobody really paid much attention. However,
DQ's headline touting year-over-year prices disguised some very "interesting" news embedded in their data.
As even short-term readers have heard us say time and again. house prices
in Silicon Valley make most of their annual increases in
the spring.Prices for 2007 were on
target to break that mold --until you look past DQ's spin, dutifully parroted by local TV and radio foofs.
As usual, we insist on studying the data points reported
in DQ's weekly table. Lo and behold,
the price change reported by DQ from November 30 to December 31, 2007 was dramatic!
Thanks to significant last-minute price drops,
results for 2007 did not break the trend!
Since 2003, prices showeda median change of in the second half of each year of:
Median 2003
2004 2005 2006 2007 January -$4K
-$47K -0- +$5K -0- February +$7K +$52K +$22K +$17K
+$39K March -$10K +$39K +$33K +$13K
+$6K April +$15K +$11K +$17K -$10K
+$48K May -$4K +$15K
+$8K +$30K -$9K June +$29K
+$9K +$15K +$15K -$3K July
-$24K -$9K -$5K -$20K +$15K August
+$17K -0- +$14K -$25K
-$1K September -$3K +$5K
-$9K +$10K -$30K October
+$10K +$5K +$9K -$2K +$11K November -0- -0- +$1K +1K +$13K December -0- +$10K -$15K -$25K
-$60K!!! Total
+$43K +$90K +$90K +$5K +$29K
Comparing
YTD numbers for the last four years, we find
YTD thru2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Dec. +$47K +$137K +$90K +$5K +$29K
Let's peek at YTD volume over the last few years.
Resales 2003
2004 2005 2006
2007
December
1,902 1,681 1,401 1,167 684
YTD20,37322,73420,35515,299 11,007
To make thinks a little more interesting, let's invent
a "new" statistic "year-over-two-years-ago" or "y-o-2y" and "year-over-three-years-ago"
or "y-o-3y":
Resale
Units 2003 2004200520062007 y-o-y y-o-2y y-o-3y
Dec1,902 1,681
1,401 1,167 684 -41%-51% -59%
YTD20,37322,73420,35515,299 11,007-40% -46% -51%
Does anyone remember the press release
mentioning sales volume was down over -40% y-o-y? Or over -50% y-o-2y?
Trying to look forward instead of back, below are DQ and Metro Listing Service (MLS) listings for Santa Clara County over the last
two years:
As of... DQ Change MLS# Change
Diff. Jan12'06 1,687 (DQ
vs.MLS) Feb 9 1,818 Mar 9 2,103 Apr 9 2,194 May
7 2,606 Jun 8 2,974 Jul 6 3,185 Aug 10 3,389 Sept
7 3,401 4,201
+23% Oct 5 3,389 +101%/YTD 3,899
+15% Nov 7 3,070 +82% 3,496
+14% Dec06'06 2,571 +52% 2,843
+11% Jan09'07 1,969 +17%/y-o-y 2,554
+30% Feb 8 2,238 +23% 2,901 +14%/YTD +30% Mar 8 2,841
+50% 3,156 +24%
+11% Apr 5 2,812 +28% 3,680 +44% +31% May 3 3,332 +28% 4,255
+67% +28% Jun
7 3,809 +28% 4,501 +76%
+18% Jul 5 3,972 +25% 4,510 +77% +14% Aug 2 4,156
+23% 4,936 +93%
+19% Sep 7 4,701 +33% 5,097 +21%/y-o-y +8% Oct 11 4,866
+44% 5,222 +34% +7%
Nov 8 4,780 +56% 5,123 +47%
+7%
Nov 29 4,596 +79% 4,642
+63% +1%
Jan 10 4,145 +111% 4,699
+84% -12%
(MLS data is pulled within a day or two of creating this table.)
We recently
added a column showing the difference between DQ's listing count and the corresponding MLS figure. We assume these figures are finally converging because,
as sales get more and more difficult to close, various "tricks" used by real estate agents to artificially reduce the number
of listings areabandoned.
Last
month, for the first time since we started keeping track, DQ's y-o-y figure not
only over 100% but MLS now admits to more listings than DQ.
Most
interesting this month are the peak tables:
Peak Since
All HomesCurrent Peak Date Peak y-o-y
Santa Clara Co.$655K $714K Jun13'07 -8.3% -0.8%
San Mateo Co.$730K $820K Jun06'07-11.0% 0.2%
Santa Cruz Co.$618K$735K May26'06-15.9% -7.7%
Peak Since
Resale HomesCurrentPeak Date Peak y-o-y
Santa Clara Co$739K$817K Aug27'07 -9.5% 2.9%
San Mateo Co.$769K$925K Jun26'07-16.9%-0.8%
Santa Cruz Co$663K$810K Aug20'07-18.1% -6.7%
(San
Mateo and Santa Cruz numbers are more volatile than Santa Clara County. They bounce, up and down, on lower volume,
more than Santa Clara County.)
In
the interest of shortening this missive, we planned
to drop these y-o-y price charts. Then we noticed the sizes of this month's changes! Maybe we'll drop
them next month. (Maybe there is demand for this data as a premium feature?)
Bottom Line: The
moment of truth may finally be at hand. Realtors concede sales volume is the lowest since ~1995. (In case you
think 1995 is a random date, please see our previous missive on Santa Clara County "residents employed" in
1995. "Spinning the Stats," http://www.viewfromsiliconvalley.com/id391.html )
Nowhere did we see a report mentioning December's -$60K
price decline for "resale homes" in Santa Clara County! (In case you're wondering the "All Homes" figure was -$23K.)
This was the largest single-month decline in our five years of tracking!
If
you're wondering, a $720K "resale homes" was last seen February, 2007. If asked to put a date to the moment when low-end
house house sales dropped so badly that it started to actively distort the median price, February, 2007 figures
to be a strong candidate.