April 25, 2008
The Last 30 Days (Mar'08
Data)
(c) copyright View from Silicon Valley, 2008. All
rights reserved.
House
prices in Silicon Valley make most of their annual increases in the spring.
Until recently, we expressed this information as
follows:
2H03:
0.0% 2H04: +1.8% 2H05:
-0.7% 2H06: -7.8%
(= -$60.5K!!) 2H07: -7.7% (= -$55K!!)
2H08: tbd
Starting in
2008, we refined this data to:
Feb-Jun Balance Chg%
2003: +$37K -$4K 2004: +$126K -$18K 2005: +$95K -$5K -0.7% 2006:
+$65K -$56K -7.8% 2007: +$81K -$52K -7.7%
2008: -$5.5K! -$47K -7.1% (= -$52.5K YTD)
On balance, sellers make their profits
(or buyers paid the most premium) off buyers in the February through June selling season. Outside of those months,
even during a once-in-two-generations-price-blow-off
year, prices fell.
Our usual historic chart,
it looks like this:
Resale
Median 2003 2004 2005
2006 2007 2008 Jan
-$4K -$47K -0- +$5K
-0- -$47K Feb_ +$7K +$52K +$22K +$17K +$39K
+$24K Mar -$10K +$39K +$33K +$13K +$6K -$29.5K Apr +$15K +$11K
+$17K -$10K +$48K May -$4K +$15K
+$8K +$30K -$9K Jun +$29K +$9K +$15K
+$15K -$3K Jul -$24K -$9K
-$5K -$20K +$15K Aug +$17K -0- +$14K
-$25K -$1K Sep _ -$3K
+$5K -$9K +$10K -$30K Oct +$10K +$5K +$9K -$2K +$11K Nov _ -0- -0- +$1K
+1K +$13K Dec _-0- +$10K -$15K -$25K -$60K! Tot +$33K
+$90K +$90K +$9K +$29K
Netting this out to YTD price changes shows:
YTD 2003 2004 2005
2006 2007 2008
Mar -$7K +$44K +$55K +$35K +$45K -$52.5K
Next, let's peek at YTD volume:
Resales '03 2004 2005
2006 2007 2008 Mar 1,365 1,912 1,862 1,592 1,239
777
YTD
4,029 4,870 4,347 3,524 3,243 1,938
We predict this is the year people spending their own money,
as opposed the real estate and political foofs advocating the spending of someone else's,
will starting wondering if it is time to buy.
We submit the relevant comparison year is 2004. In our
estimation, early-2004 was when the Kool-aid
of low rates and "sure thing" trumped common sense and the laws of economics.
As long as prices remain
above early-2004 levels, we submit they're
still artificially inflated.
In addition to "year-over-year" (y-o-y) and "year-over-two-years-ago" ("y-o-2" ), lets start using "year-over-four-years-ago" or ("y-o-4") . Conveniently, this nets us a comparison to 2004 sales:
Resale
Units 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007_ 2008_y-o-y y-o-2 y-o-4 Mar 1,365 1,912 1,862 1,592 1,239 777 -37% -51%
-59%
Part of the rationale for ignoring y-o-y (and even y-o-2y and y-o-4y) volume is the claim there aren't enough properties for sale.
Fortunately, we have data on this very subject:
As of... DQ Change MLS# Change
Diff. Jan12'06 1,687 (DQ
vs.MLS) Feb 9 1,818 Mar 9 2,103 Apr 9 2,194 May
7 2,606 Jun 8 2,974 Jul 6 3,185 Aug 10 3,389 Sept
7 3,401 4,201
+23% Oct 5 3,389 +101%/YTD 3,899
+15% Nov 7 3,070 +82% 3,496
+14% Dec06'06 2,571 +52% 2,843
+11% Jan09'07 1,969 +17%/y-o-y 2,554
+30% Feb 8 2,238 +23% 2,901 +14%/YTD +30% Mar 8 2,841
+50% 3,156 +24%
+11% Apr 5 2,812 +28% 3,680 +44% +31% May 3 3,332 +28% 4,255
+67% +28% Jun
7 3,809 +28% 4,501 +76%
+18% Jul 5 3,972 +25% 4,510 +77% +14% Aug 2 4,156
+23% 4,936 +93%
+19% Sep 7 4,701 +33% 5,097 +21%/y-o-y +8% Oct 11 4,866
+44% 5,222 +34% +7%
Nov 8 4,780 +56% 5,123 +47%
+7%
Nov 29 4,596 +79% 4,642
+63% +1%
Jan 10 4,145 +111% 4,699
+84% +13%
Feb 7
4,529 +102% 5,008 +73% +11%
Mar 6 4,815 +69%
5,694 +73% +18%
Apr 10 5,408 +92% 6,144
+67% +14%
MLS data is pulled within a day or two of creating this table (meaning the MLS "as of" date tends to be a few days later than DQ's).
Did you know resale home prices, even in Santa Clara County, are down a double-digit percentage
since their June, 2007 peak? (Less than 10 months ago?!)
Peak Since
All Homes Current Peak Date Peak y-o-y
Santa Clara Co. $620K $714K Jun13'07 -13.2% -9.2%
San Mateo Co. $723K $820K Jun06'07 -11.8% -4.2%
Santa Cruz Co. *$560K $735K May26'06 -23.8% -17.0%
Peak Since
Resale Homes Current
Peak Date Peak y-o-y
Santa Clara Co *$716.5K $817K Aug27'07 -12.3% -3.2%
San Mateo Co. *$825K $925K Jun26'07 -10.8% -0.4%
Santa Cruz Co *$621K
$810K Aug20'07 -23.3% -16.1%
* = as of March 27
San Mateo and Santa Cruz numbers are much
more volatile than Santa Clara County. They bounce, up and down, on lower volume, more than Santa Clara County, on a regular basis.
In
the interest of brevity, we dropped
the rolling y-o-y price charts. (Please
let us know if you would still like to see them?)
Bottom Line:
As
always, buy at your own risk. If you decide to take the plunge, please feel free to share with us the (financial, and
emotional) details?
(Still) coming soon:
A review of the cost to rent vs. own on several properties up for rent this spring.
The above commentary and any linked article, website and advertisement are for entertainment purposes only.
Nothing in this page or web site is intended as advice to buy, sell or hold any stock, bond, real estate nor any other financial
product or service. Buy or sell at your own risk.
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|